Screenwriters are typically the originators if they’re not working on an adaptation, who create the foundation for films… the script. The creators of the story, through action, characters and dialogue, they’re typically not given the same credit as directors when it comes to their work. Whether in film articles or reviews, there’s an inclination for the importance of the screenwriter to be downplayed.
Perhaps this is because the director has more control over the final product. Screenwriters dream up the plot and scenarios, but its the director who translates this blueprint to screen. Having their name on the film, they’re ultimately responsible… and typically the ones who take the most flak if things don’t go to plan. Directors are also in a position where they can either adjust the script to the point of taking a co-writing credit or making changes on the day if they wish. Able to make creative decisions around the casting, cinematography and editing, this is why they’re often seen as “authors” even if the script or concept wasn’t theirs to begin with.
Another factor that comes into play is that screenwriters are not always on the set or even involved with the actual film-making process. This means they almost hand over their product in order for the filmmaking to begin. Not as large or in charge, the screenwriter is often on the fringe of productions and not as visible as the director. Not working with the actors, cinematographer or crew, they typically take on a behind-the-scenes role.
During the writer’s strike, the value of a screenwriter’s contribution was also called into question, urging the industry to re-evaluate. Coming at a time when their jobs are under threat, the strike has been brought about to avoid things from getting progressively worse. Already underpaid and undervalued, the median annual earnings for a screenwriter are significantly lower than the earnings for a director.
While screenwriting is often romanticised, there’s also an apparent lack of awareness when it comes to what role they play in the film industry. Not getting as much praise when a film succeeds, or tending towards the tried-and-tested name screenwriters, it seems to be regarded as less glamourous or important in the grand scheme of things… not calling the shots. The exception is of course the writer-director or auteur who’s given an added level of appreciation for coming up with the vision and executing it with precision.
One possible reason for a lack of perceived change in how screenwriters are recognised is that they may prefer it this way. Being a behind-the-scenes component does offer certain privileges from being able to shift the blame for a misinterpretation of their script or coming out of hiding to celebrate the good times when films rack up awards. Not being in the public eye means they can quietly enjoy the rewards without having to sacrifice their privacy. While most people you ask would want to earn more and get extra credit for good work, perhaps in this case… sitting behind the typewriter is more comfortable than wielding this double-edged sword.
What helps shift the tide is for screenwriters to take more ownership over their work. Getting them to speak about their process or some of the challenges on more high profile platforms will help inspire future screenwriters as well as create more awareness of the screenwriters whose work we should be rewarding with our time. This added visibility is a boon for their careers but can also help educate the public going forward. Whether it be film studies, courses or even campaigns about the value of screenwriters, there are many ways to relay the nuances and gravity of the screenwriter. Moreover, perhaps special funds or programmes could be introduced to help debutants get through the initial stages.